In June 2009, the German Federal Ministry of Environment granted a fund to the German company AWN Umwelt GmbH (Buchen) to establish a mechanical biological treatment plant in the City of Gaobeidian (PR China). The facility is seen as a lighthouse project for GHG mitigation.
In July 2009 the project work was launched. Detailed engineering design has been finalized by Pöyry Environment by October 2009 and the construction works were tendered. The site clearing and the construction of provision infrastructure was finalized by December 2009. In January 2010 the construction of the facility was started and will be finalized by April 2010. It is expected that the facility will run on full operation in summer 2011. Emission reductions of approximately 8.000-25.000 t CO
Copyright: | © Wasteconsult International |
Quelle: | Waste-to-Resource 2011 (Mai 2011) |
Seiten: | 12 |
Preis: | € 0,00 |
Autor: | Dr.-Ing. Florian Kölsch Dr. Mathias Ginter Prof. Dr.-Ing. Klaus Fricke |
Artikel nach Login kostenfrei anzeigen | |
Artikel weiterempfehlen | |
Artikel nach Login kommentieren |
Fremdstoffgehalte in den Sieblinien von Biogut nach Voraufbereitung
© Witzenhausen-Institut für Abfall, Umwelt und Energie GmbH (11/2024)
Fremd- und Kunststoffeinträge im getrennt erfassten Biogut rücken zunehmend in den Fokus des Gesetzgebers. Mit der Novellierung der BioAbfV treten zum 01.05.2025 erstmals Grenzwerte in Kraft, die sich auf das frische Biogut vor der biologischen Behandlung beziehen.
Hochlauf der Wasserstoffwirtschaft
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Überblick über und Diskussion der Maßnahmen zum beschleunigten Ausbau
der Wasserstoffinfrastruktur in Deutschland
Die innerstaatliche Umsetzung des Pariser Klimaschutzübereinkommens
- ein Rechtsvergleich
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Like all public international law treaties, the Paris Climate Accords rely on national law for their implementation. The success of the agreement therefore depends, to a large extent, on the stepstaken or not taken by national governments and legislators as well as on the instruments and mechanisms chosen for this task. Against this background, the present article compares different approaches to the implementation of the Paris Agreement, using court decisions as a means to assess their (legal) effectiveness.