Regenerative Energie
The rapid development of the electronic industry in the post-industrial society contributes to the increase in the production volumes of chemical currentsources (CCS). This article is concerned with the extended producer responsibility (EPR) concept and the mechanisms of its implementation in the spent chemical current sources (SCCS) management in Russia and in the EU countries. The EPR organization models for greening the SCCS lifecycle in these countries using the existing legal basis of the European Union and Russia are presented.
In Europe, EPR is known as an efficient tool for managing different waste flows and reducing their disposal to solid municipal waste landfills. In addition, EPR contributes to the hierarchical sequence in the waste management (Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Waste Framework Directive)) with the priority of waste prevention. At the EU level, three Directives introduce EPR as a political approach: Directive ELV 2000/53/EC, new Directive WEEE 2012/19/EU, and Directive on accumulators 2006/66/EC. The EPR concept is also widely used in support of the implementation of Directive on packaging and packaging waste (94/62/EC) though Directive itself does not establish this principle.
| Copyright: | © Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben |
| Quelle: | Recy & Depotech 2018 (November 2018) |
| Seiten: | 4 |
| Preis: | € 2,00 |
| Autor: | Valeriia Zilenina Dr.-Ing. Olga Ulanova Prof. Dr.-Ing. Christina Dornack |
| Diesen Fachartikel kaufen... (nach Kauf erscheint Ihr Warenkorb oben links) | |
| Artikel weiterempfehlen | |
| Artikel nach Login kommentieren | |
Hochlauf der Wasserstoffwirtschaft
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Überblick über und Diskussion der Maßnahmen zum beschleunigten Ausbau
der Wasserstoffinfrastruktur in Deutschland
Die innerstaatliche Umsetzung des Pariser Klimaschutzübereinkommens
- ein Rechtsvergleich
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Like all public international law treaties, the Paris Climate Accords rely on national law for their implementation. The success of the agreement therefore depends, to a large extent, on the stepstaken or not taken by national governments and legislators as well as on the instruments and mechanisms chosen for this task. Against this background, the present article compares different approaches to the implementation of the Paris Agreement, using court decisions as a means to assess their (legal) effectiveness.
Klimaschutzrecht und Erzeugung erneuerbarer Energien in der Schweiz
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Verschachtelte Gesetzgebung unter politischer Ungewissheit