Up to the present most development banks (such as the World Bank or the German KfW) have sponsored in particular the fundamentals of waste management such as collection, transport and the orderly depositing of waste. The German Ministry of the Environment would like in future, however, to sponsor rather more advanced techniques for waste treatment, also in countries where this has hardly been considered before. Up to now the general opinion was that such higher quality waste treatment techniques (such as e.g. using biogas facilities, compost plants or waste incinerating plants) are still too expensive for most countries in the world. On closer inspection, however, it emerges that there are hardly any differences in the overall costs for waste disposal through cost reductions when landfilling and possible proceeds from various treatment systems. The consortium IGIP/L.e.e./ICP has now developed a calculation tool with which different waste management Scenarios can be compared relatively easily.
The introduction of proper and environmentally compatible waste management is supported financially with the aim of fundamentally improving the infrastructure in many developing and emerging countries by numerous development banks, such as, for example, the German KfW bank group, the EBRD or EIB (development banks of the EU) or by the World Bank. Until a few years ago, fundamental waste management measures such as collection and transport of the waste as well as proper landfilling were sponsored here by the FRG through the KfW bank group and the Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (giz).
These measures can in general be borne economically by the populations in these states, whereas higher quality waste disposal systems including technically more sophisticated facilities, such as e.g. a mechanical-biological treatment plant (MBA), composting or a fermentation plant, seem too expensive.
The basis used for this assessment is the principle that the costs of waste disposal should not be more than approx. 1 % of the average income of the population. If it can be seen that waste management measures are too expensive and cannot be borne by the population in the long run, such projects are usually not sponsored either, since this sponsoring would not be sustainable.
The new guidelines of the environmental and development policies in the FRD go beyond simple waste disposal, however. Where possible, recycling and climate-friendly technologies should be given attention. This certainly seems possible in emerging countries such as Turkey, for example, if the economic conditions are favorable.
| Copyright: | © Thomé-Kozmiensky Verlag GmbH |
| Quelle: | Waste Management, Volume 3 (Oktober 2012) |
| Seiten: | 11 |
| Preis: | € 0,00 |
| Autor: | Dr.-Ing. Ludwig Streff Gerd Burkhardt |
| Artikel nach Login kostenfrei anzeigen | |
| Artikel weiterempfehlen | |
| Artikel nach Login kommentieren | |
Europäische Rechtsvorgaben und Auswirkungen auf die Bioabfallwirtschaft in Deutschland
© Witzenhausen-Institut für Abfall, Umwelt und Energie GmbH (11/2025)
Bioabfälle machen 34 % der Siedlungsabfälle aus und bilden damit die größte Abfallfraktion im Siedlungsabfall in der EU. Rund 40 Millionen Tonnen Bioabfälle werden jährlich in der EU getrennt gesammelt und in ca. 4.500 Kompostierungs- und Vergärungsanlagen behandelt.
Vom Gärrest zum hochwertigen Gärprodukt - eine Einführung
© Witzenhausen-Institut für Abfall, Umwelt und Energie GmbH (11/2025)
Auch mittel- bis langfristig steht zu erwarten, dass die Kaskade aus anaerober und aerober Behandlung Standard für die Biogutbehandlung sein wird.
Die Mischung macht‘s - Der Gärrestmischer in der Praxis
© Witzenhausen-Institut für Abfall, Umwelt und Energie GmbH (11/2025)
Zur Nachbehandlung von Gärrest aus Bio- und Restabfall entwickelte Eggersmann den Gärrestmischer, der aus Gärresten und Zuschlagstoffen homogene, gut belüftbare Mischungen erzeugt. Damit wird den besonderen Anforderungen der Gärreste mit hohem Wassergehalt begegnet und eine effiziente Kompostierung ermöglicht.