Minimum treatment requirements for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) are laid down by the Directive 2002/96/EC (WEEE Directive, last amended by 2008/34/EC). Annex II (1) to the Directive specifies 15 substances, preparations and components in total, which as a minimum have to be removed from any separately collected WEEE (Depollution). The following components can be part of small Electrical and Electronic Equipment (sWEEE): capacitors (all PCB-containing capacitors and electrolyte capacitors), batteries, printed circuit boards, toner cartridges, liquid crystal displays, mercury containing components,
such as switches or backlighting lamps, asbestos-containing components, components containing refractory ceramic fibres, components containing radioactive substances, plastic-containing brominated flame retardants and external electric cables.
Treatment requirements for WEEE set in Directive 2002/96/EC include the removal of hazardous components (de-pollution). To date, no comparative analysis of achieved removal has been undertaken for small WEEE. In this paper, depollution in Austria is analysed. The mass of selected components (capacitors, printed circuit boards, batteries, toner cartridges and liquid crystal displays) removed is compared to estimated values for small WEEE input material. The results reveal that only a part of the components is actually removed with a high variation between components and plants assessed. The overall rate of removal ranged from 72% (estimated value for batteries) to 21% (estimated value for LCD-panels). This implies the forwarding of substantial quantities of hazardous substances to mechanical treatment processes particularly relevant in terms of dispersion of pollutants, health risks for plant workers and loss of valuable materials. However, the quantities of hazardous substances being introduced into incineration or MBT via small WEEE ending up as residual waste are even higher.
Copyright: | © Lehrstuhl für Abfallverwertungstechnik und Abfallwirtschaft der Montanuniversität Leoben |
Quelle: | Depotech 2010 (November 2010) |
Seiten: | 6 |
Preis: | € 3,00 |
Autor: | Maria Tesar Dr. Stefan Salhofer |
Diesen Fachartikel kaufen... (nach Kauf erscheint Ihr Warenkorb oben links) | |
Artikel weiterempfehlen | |
Artikel nach Login kommentieren |
Hochlauf der Wasserstoffwirtschaft
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Überblick über und Diskussion der Maßnahmen zum beschleunigten Ausbau
der Wasserstoffinfrastruktur in Deutschland
Die innerstaatliche Umsetzung des Pariser Klimaschutzübereinkommens
- ein Rechtsvergleich
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Like all public international law treaties, the Paris Climate Accords rely on national law for their implementation. The success of the agreement therefore depends, to a large extent, on the stepstaken or not taken by national governments and legislators as well as on the instruments and mechanisms chosen for this task. Against this background, the present article compares different approaches to the implementation of the Paris Agreement, using court decisions as a means to assess their (legal) effectiveness.
Klimaschutzrecht und Erzeugung erneuerbarer Energien in der Schweiz
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Verschachtelte Gesetzgebung unter politischer Ungewissheit