Regenerative Energie
A periodic review of central developments in the area of climate regulation and the carbon market, covering legislative activities, high-level events, and new case law at the international and regional level.
A sigh of relief came from the majority of negotiators around the table when the Bali Action Plan was passed. Despite the fact that it may not be as ambitious as some countries and as some civil society sectors were hoping, it did mean that negotiations on a Post-Kyoto regime were officially launched. An Ad-Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action (AWG-LCA) has been set up for this purpose. In the first half of 2008 the AWG-LCA met twice. Its first meeting was held in Bangkok from 31 March to 4 April 2008, and the second meeting convened at the UNFCCC headquarters in Bonn from 2 to 13 June 2008. On both occasions, the AWG-LCA met alongside the sessions of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Future Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP).
| Copyright: | © Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH |
| Quelle: | Issue 2/2008 (Juli 2008) |
| Seiten: | 11 |
| Preis: | € 16,00 |
| Autor: | Francesco Sindico |
| Diesen Fachartikel kaufen... (nach Kauf erscheint Ihr Warenkorb oben links) | |
| Artikel weiterempfehlen | |
| Artikel nach Login kommentieren | |
Fremdstoffgehalte in den Sieblinien von Biogut nach Voraufbereitung
© Witzenhausen-Institut für Abfall, Umwelt und Energie GmbH (11/2024)
Fremd- und Kunststoffeinträge im getrennt erfassten Biogut rücken zunehmend in den Fokus des Gesetzgebers. Mit der Novellierung der BioAbfV treten zum 01.05.2025 erstmals Grenzwerte in Kraft, die sich auf das frische Biogut vor der biologischen Behandlung beziehen.
Hochlauf der Wasserstoffwirtschaft
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Überblick über und Diskussion der Maßnahmen zum beschleunigten Ausbau
der Wasserstoffinfrastruktur in Deutschland
Die innerstaatliche Umsetzung des Pariser Klimaschutzübereinkommens
- ein Rechtsvergleich
© Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (8/2024)
Like all public international law treaties, the Paris Climate Accords rely on national law for their implementation. The success of the agreement therefore depends, to a large extent, on the stepstaken or not taken by national governments and legislators as well as on the instruments and mechanisms chosen for this task. Against this background, the present article compares different approaches to the implementation of the Paris Agreement, using court decisions as a means to assess their (legal) effectiveness.